VOO vs XLE Overlap

Comparing Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

Holdings Overlap
2.79%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
21 of 22
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VOO
XLE
2.8%
VOO Only
Overlap
XLE Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VOO Return
+8.55%
XLE Return
+6.10%
Winner
VOO
+2.45%
Max Drawdown
VOO: -5.1%
XLE: -7.4%
VOO Volatility (annualized)11.37%
XLE Volatility (annualized)17.69%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VOO
XLE
1 Year Return
+26.5%โœ“
+8.2%
3 Year Return
+10.2%
+18.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+15.8%โœ“
+12.8%
Volatility
18.20%โœ“
28.50%
Expense Ratio
0.03%โœ“
0.10%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VOO
XLE
Volatility
18.20%โœ“
28.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.82โœ“
0.42
Sortino Ratio
1.15โœ“
0.58
Max Drawdown
-33.80%โœ“
-62.50%
Beta
1.00
1.35

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

17 - 3

๐Ÿ† VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VOO:0.03%โœ“
vs
XLE:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VOO:503 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLE:21 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VOO:+15.8%โœ“
vs
XLE:+12.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VOO: 39.6% in top 10โœ“
XLE: 74.8% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VOO: $380B โœ“โœ“
XLE: $32B
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VOO: 0.82โœ“
XLE: 0.42
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VOO: 18.2%โœ“
XLE: 28.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VOO: 18.4% unique
XLE: 97.2% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but XLE is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

21 shared holdings representing 2.8% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVOO WeightXLE WeightOverlap
1
XOM
XOM
0.84%23.35%0.84%
2
COP
COP
0.19%6.90%0.19%
3
WMB
WMB
0.13%4.55%0.13%
4
MPC
MPC
0.10%3.98%0.10%
5
EOG
EOG
0.10%3.95%0.10%
6
PSX
PSX
0.09%3.88%0.09%
7
SLB
SLB
0.09%3.92%0.09%
8
KMI
KMI
0.09%3.66%0.09%
9
VLO
VLO
0.09%3.74%0.09%
10
BKR
BKR
0.08%3.23%0.08%

Overlap by Sector

Energy
7 stocks ยท 1.50% overlap
Other
14 stocks ยท 0.81% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

21
Shared Stocks
2.8%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.37%
AAPLAAPL7.07%
MSFTMSFT6.24%
AMZNAMZN3.86%
AVGOAVGO3.24%

Top Holdings Only in XLE

Unique to XLE

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
CVXCVX16.91%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs