QQQM vs VUG: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Vanguard Growth ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
90.51%
Very High Overlap
Shared Holdings
9 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
VUG
90.5%
QQQM Only
Overlap
VUG Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

QQQM Return
+17.61%
VUG Return
+9.10%
Winner
QQQM
+8.51%
Max Drawdown
QQQM: -11.7%
VUG: -14.2%
QQQM Volatility (annualized)18.82%
VUG Volatility (annualized)18.98%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQM
VUG
1 Year Return
N/A
+32.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+13.8%
5 Year Return
N/A
+19.5%
Volatility
undefined%
21.20%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.04%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

4 - 10

๐Ÿ† VUG wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%โœ“
vs
VUG:0.04%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
VUG:285 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10โœ“
VUG: 60.6% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
VUG: $130B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% uniqueโœ“
VUG: 60.9% unique

Bottom line: VUG wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VUG for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

9 shared holdings representing 90.5% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightVUG WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.85%12.85%8.85%
2
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
7.92%11.85%7.92%
3
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
7.45%9.25%7.45%
4
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc
5.38%6.85%5.38%
5
META
Meta Platforms Inc
3.82%4.65%3.82%
6
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
2.85%3.85%2.85%
7
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
3.55%2.65%2.65%
8
GOOG
Alphabet Inc Class C
2.45%3.25%2.45%
9
TSLA
Tesla Inc
2.38%2.95%2.38%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
7 stocks ยท 35.99% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 7.76% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

9
Shared Stocks
90.5%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in QQQM

Unique to QQQM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp2.28%

Top Holdings Only in VUG

Unique to VUG

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
LLYEli Lilly and Co2.45%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on QQQM or VUG?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs