QQQM vs IWF: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
60.10%
High Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
IWF
60.1%
QQQM Only
Overlap
IWF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

QQQM Return
+17.61%
IWF Return
+6.89%
Winner
QQQM
+10.72%
Max Drawdown
QQQM: -11.7%
IWF: -13.3%
QQQM Volatility (annualized)18.82%
IWF Volatility (annualized)18.15%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQM
IWF
1 Year Return
N/A
+32.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+13.5%
5 Year Return
N/A
+19.2%
Volatility
undefined%
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.19%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

4 - 10

๐Ÿ† IWF wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%โœ“
vs
IWF:0.19%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
IWF:475 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10โœ“
IWF: 61.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
IWF: $85B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% uniqueโœ“
IWF: 39.6% unique

Bottom line: IWF wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider IWF for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 60.1% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightIWF WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.85%11.91%8.85%
2
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
7.92%10.73%7.92%
3
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
7.45%12.71%7.45%
4
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc
5.38%4.24%4.24%
5
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
3.55%5.62%3.55%
6
META
Meta Platforms Inc
3.82%3.29%3.29%
7
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
2.85%3.56%2.85%
8
GOOG
Alphabet Inc Class C
2.45%2.91%2.45%
9
TSLA
Tesla Inc
2.38%3.85%2.38%
10
COST
Costco Wholesale Corp
2.28%1.24%1.24%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
7 stocks ยท 36.36% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 6.62% overlap
Consumer Staples
1 stocks ยท 1.24% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
60.1%
Total Overlap
3
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IWF

Unique to IWF

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
LLYELI LILLY2.47%
VVISA INC CLASS A1.74%
MAMASTERCARD INC CLASS A1.37%
NFLXNETFLIX INC1.29%
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS A1.25%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on QQQM or IWF?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs