JEPI vs XLF: Complete Comparison
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: JEPI and XLF are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
17 shared holdings representing 12.4% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | JEPI Weight | XLF Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MA MA | 1.55% | 5.81% | 1.55% |
| 2 | V V | 1.50% | 7.26% | 1.50% |
| 3 | AXP AXP | 1.10% | 2.59% | 1.10% |
| 4 | PGR PGR | 0.89% | 1.74% | 0.89% |
| 5 | TRV TRV | 0.92% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
| 6 | AJG AJG | 0.94% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| 7 | CB CB | 0.72% | 1.46% | 0.72% |
| 8 | BRK-B BRK-B | 0.67% | 11.80% | 0.67% |
| 9 | CME CME | 0.62% | 1.27% | 0.62% |
| 10 | AMP AMP | 0.71% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in JEPI
Unique to JEPI
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | GOOGL | 1.67% |
| JNJ | JNJ | 1.63% |
| ABBV | ABBV | 1.62% |
| MGMXX | MGMXX | 1.62% |
| ADI | ADI | 1.56% |
Top Holdings Only in XLF
Unique to XLF
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| JPM | JPM | 10.82% |
| WFC | WFC | 3.73% |
| GS | GS | 3.47% |
| MS | MS | 2.84% |
| C | C | 2.64% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.