IWF vs VTI: Complete Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ VTI wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VTI wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VTI for your portfolio, but IWF is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
8 shared holdings representing 53.2% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | IWF Weight | VTI Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL APPLE INC | 11.91% | 5.80% | 5.80% |
| 2 | MSFT MICROSOFT CORP | 10.73% | 5.45% | 5.45% |
| 3 | NVDA NVIDIA CORP | 12.71% | 4.25% | 4.25% |
| 4 | AMZN AMAZON COM INC | 4.24% | 3.00% | 3.00% |
| 5 | META META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A | 3.29% | 2.02% | 2.02% |
| 6 | GOOGL ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 3.56% | 1.77% | 1.77% |
| 7 | GOOG ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 2.91% | 1.52% | 1.52% |
| 8 | TSLA TESLA INC | 3.85% | 1.36% | 1.36% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in IWF
Unique to IWF
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO | BROADCOM INC | 5.62% |
| LLY | ELI LILLY | 2.47% |
| V | VISA INC CLASS A | 1.74% |
| MA | MASTERCARD INC CLASS A | 1.37% |
| NFLX | NETFLIX INC | 1.29% |
Top Holdings Only in VTI
Unique to VTI
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.44% |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.19% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.
Want deeper analysis on IWF or VTI?
Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.
Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.