IGV vs DIA: Complete Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF vs SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
15.92%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
2 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IGV
DIA
15.9%
IGV Only
Overlap
DIA Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IGV Return
-13.61%
DIA Return
+1.59%
Winner
DIA
+15.20%
Max Drawdown
IGV: -29.7%
DIA: -9.8%
IGV Volatility (annualized)34.89%
DIA Volatility (annualized)14.17%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
IGV
DIA
1 Year Return
+28.5%โœ“
+22.8%
3 Year Return
+10.8%โœ“
+8.5%
5 Year Return
+20.5%โœ“
+13.2%
Volatility
28.50%
17.50%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.41%
0.16%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
IGV
DIA
Volatility
28.50%
17.50%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.68
0.71
Sortino Ratio
0.92
1.02โœ“
Max Drawdown
-48.50%
-36.80%โœ“
Beta
1.28
0.92

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

6 - 10

๐Ÿ† DIA wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
IGV:0.41%โœ“
vs
DIA:0.16%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
IGV:120 holdingsโœ“
vs
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
IGV:+20.5%โœ“
vs
DIA:+13.2%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
IGV: 61.9% in top 10
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
IGV: $9B
DIA: $35Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
IGV: 0.68
DIA: 0.71
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
IGV: 28.5%
DIA: 17.5%โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
IGV: 89.3% unique
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: DIA wins with better expense ratio. Consider DIA for your portfolio, but IGV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

2 shared holdings representing 15.9% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIGV WeightDIA WeightOverlap
1
MSFT
MSFT
8.59%6.85%6.85%
2
CRM
CRM
7.29%5.45%5.45%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
2 stocks ยท 12.30% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

2
Shared Stocks
15.9%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IGV

Unique to IGV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
PLTRPLTR9.86%
ORCLORCL6.23%
INTUINTU5.75%
NOWNOW5.69%
APPAPP5.17%

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
UNHUnitedHealth Group9.85%
GSGoldman Sachs8.25%
HDHome Depot6.65%
CATCaterpillar Inc6.25%
AMGNAmgen Inc5.85%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on IGV or DIA?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs