IEMG vs XLK: Complete Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 31
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IEMG
XLK
0.0%
IEMG Only
Overlap
XLK Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IEMG Return
+13.78%
XLK Return
+24.82%
Winner
XLK
+11.04%
Max Drawdown
IEMG: -13.2%
XLK: -14.5%
IEMG Volatility (annualized)26.53%
XLK Volatility (annualized)25.14%

📈 Comparison

Metric
IEMG
XLK
1 Year Return
+14.2%
+35.2%
3 Year Return
+2.2%
+15.8%
5 Year Return
+5.8%
+25.5%
Volatility
21.80%
24.20%
Expense Ratio
0.09%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
IEMG
XLK
Volatility
21.80%
24.20%
Sharpe Ratio
0.22
1.05
Sortino Ratio
0.28
1.42
Max Drawdown
-50.50%
-38.50%
Beta
0.92
1.22

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

11 - 5

🏆 IEMG wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
IEMG:0.09%
vs
XLK:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
IEMG:2,679 holdings
vs
XLK:65 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
IEMG:+5.8%
vs
XLK:+25.5%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
IEMG: 2.3% in top 10
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
IEMG: $85B ✓
XLK: $55B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
IEMG: 0.22
XLK: 1.05
📉 Volatility
IEMG: 21.8%
XLK: 24.2%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
IEMG: 100.0% unique
XLK: 65.5% unique

Bottom line: IEMG wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider IEMG for your portfolio, but XLK is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIEMG WeightXLK WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IEMG

Unique to IEMG

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
PDDPDD0.80%
NUNU0.45%
AUAU0.33%
BAPBAP0.15%
YUMCYUMC0.14%

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA14.84%
AAPLAAPL13.10%
MSFTMSFT11.75%
AVGOAVGO5.36%
PLTRPLTR3.75%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on IEMG or XLK?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs