ICLN vs XLK: Complete Comparison

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.25%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
1 of 17
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

ICLN
XLK
0.3%
ICLN Only
Overlap
XLK Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

ICLN Return
+16.60%
XLK Return
+12.16%
Winner
ICLN
+4.44%
Max Drawdown
ICLN: -11.2%
XLK: -10.5%
ICLN Volatility (annualized)25.31%
XLK Volatility (annualized)19.66%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
ICLN
XLK
1 Year Return
-5.5%
+35.2%โœ“
3 Year Return
-12.5%
+15.8%โœ“
5 Year Return
+8.5%
+25.5%โœ“
Volatility
32.50%
24.20%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.41%
0.10%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
ICLN
XLK
Volatility
32.50%
24.20%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
-0.28
1.05โœ“
Sortino Ratio
-0.42
1.42โœ“
Max Drawdown
-65.50%
-38.50%โœ“
Beta
1.15
1.22

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

7 - 13

๐Ÿ† XLK wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
ICLN:0.41%โœ“
vs
XLK:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
ICLN:75 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLK:65 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
ICLN:+8.5%โœ“
vs
XLK:+25.5%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
ICLN: 36.4% in top 10โœ“
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
ICLN: $4B
XLK: $55B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
ICLN: -0.28
XLK: 1.05โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
ICLN: 32.5%
XLK: 24.2%โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
ICLN: 99.9% uniqueโœ“
XLK: 65.5% unique

Bottom line: XLK wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but ICLN is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

1 shared holdings representing 0.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockICLN WeightXLK WeightOverlap
1
FSLR
FSLR
8.35%0.25%0.25%

Overlap by Sector

Other
1 stocks ยท 0.25% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

1
Shared Stocks
0.3%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in ICLN

Unique to ICLN

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BEBE11.15%
NXTNXT6.62%
ORAORA2.95%
ENPHENPH1.69%
PLUGPLUG1.31%

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA14.84%
AAPLAAPL13.10%
MSFTMSFT11.75%
AVGOAVGO5.36%
PLTRPLTR3.75%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on ICLN or XLK?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs