EFA vs QQQ Overlap Analysis
Comparing iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust
Visual Overlap
⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison
🏆 QQQ wins this comparison
Key Factors
▶Additional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: QQQ wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider QQQ for your portfolio, but EFA is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Shared Holdings (2 of 10 analyzed)
EFA & QQQ Intersection
| Symbol | Name | EFA | QQQ | Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASML | ASML Holding NV | 0.02% | 0.49% | 0.02% |
| AZN | AstraZeneca PLC | 0.01% | 0.27% | 0.01% |
Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.
Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.
Top Holdings Only in EFA
Unique to EFA
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NESN | Nestle SA | 0.02% |
| NVO | Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.02% |
| TM | Toyota Motor Corp | 0.02% |
| SAP | SAP SE | 0.02% |
| SHEL | Shell PLC | 0.02% |
Top Holdings Only in QQQ
Unique to QQQ
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 9.28% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 8.94% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 7.66% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 6.25% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 5.26% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.