EEM vs IWM: Complete Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.13%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
1 of 20
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

EEM
IWM
0.1%
EEM Only
Overlap
IWM Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

EEM Return
+10.79%
IWM Return
+12.41%
Winner
IWM
+1.62%
Max Drawdown
EEM: -5.2%
IWM: -8.5%
EEM Volatility (annualized)14.21%
IWM Volatility (annualized)19.30%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
EEM
IWM
1 Year Return
+12.8%
+18.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+2.5%
+4.2%โœ“
5 Year Return
+5.2%
+10.5%โœ“
Volatility
22.80%โœ“
24.80%
Expense Ratio
0.68%
0.19%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
EEM
IWM
Volatility
22.80%โœ“
24.80%
Sharpe Ratio
0.18
0.38โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.25
0.52โœ“
Max Drawdown
-52.50%
-41.50%โœ“
Beta
0.95
1.25

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

0 - 13

๐Ÿ† IWM wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
EEM:0.68%โœ“
vs
IWM:0.19%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
EEM:853 holdingsโœ“
vs
IWM:1,983 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
EEM:+5.2%โœ“
vs
IWM:+10.5%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
EEM: 2.6% in top 10
IWM: 5.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
EEM: $22B
IWM: $60B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
EEM: 0.18
IWM: 0.38โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
EEM: 22.8%
IWM: 24.8%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
EEM: 100.0% unique
IWM: 100.0% unique

Bottom line: IWM wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider IWM for your portfolio, but EEM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

1 shared holdings representing 0.1% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockEEM WeightIWM WeightOverlap
1
STNE
STNE
0.03%0.13%0.03%

Overlap by Sector

Other
1 stocks ยท 0.03% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

1
Shared Stocks
0.1%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in EEM

Unique to EEM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
PDDPDD0.83%
NUNU0.56%
AUAU0.40%
BAPBAP0.18%
YUMCYUMC0.17%

Top Holdings Only in IWM

Unique to IWM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD0.86%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP0.80%
FNFABRINET0.62%
IONQIONQ INC0.51%
NXTNEXTPOWER INC CLASS A0.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs