TQQQ vs VOO Overlap AnalysisOverlap
Comparing ProShares UltraPro QQQ and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ VOO wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but TQQQ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
73 shared holdings representing 54.7% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | TQQQ Weight | VOO Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA NVDA | 5.63% | 7.37% | 5.63% |
| 2 | AAPL AAPL | 5.05% | 7.07% | 5.05% |
| 3 | MSFT MSFT | 4.54% | 6.24% | 4.54% |
| 4 | AMZN AMZN | 3.08% | 3.86% | 3.08% |
| 5 | META META | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.40% |
| 6 | GOOGL GOOGL | 2.28% | 3.18% | 2.28% |
| 7 | GOOG GOOG | 2.12% | 2.55% | 2.12% |
| 8 | TSLA TSLA | 2.72% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
| 9 | AVGO AVGO | 2.03% | 3.24% | 2.03% |
| 10 | NFLX NFLX | 1.37% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in TQQQ
Unique to TQQQ
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| PLTR | PLTR | 1.54% |
| AMD | AMD | 1.22% |
| MU | MU | 1.08% |
| CSCO | CSCO | 1.07% |
| LRCX | LRCX | 0.77% |
Top Holdings Only in VOO
Unique to VOO
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| BRK-B | BRK-B | 1.61% |
| LLY | LLY | 1.46% |
| JPM | JPM | 1.40% |
| V | V | 0.96% |
| JNJ | JNJ | 0.85% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.