SPHD vs QQQ: Complete Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
3.35%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
6 of 49
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

SPHD
QQQ
3.4%
SPHD Only
Overlap
QQQ Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

SPHD Return
+5.08%
QQQ Return
+16.26%
Winner
QQQ
+11.17%
Max Drawdown
SPHD: -7.3%
QQQ: -11.7%
SPHD Volatility (annualized)11.00%
QQQ Volatility (annualized)18.39%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
SPHD
QQQ
1 Year Return
+16.5%
+28.2%โœ“
3 Year Return
+6.8%
+12.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+10.2%
+20.1%โœ“
Volatility
16.20%โœ“
22.50%
Expense Ratio
0.30%
0.20%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
SPHD
QQQ
Volatility
16.20%โœ“
22.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.58
0.88โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.78
1.22โœ“
Max Drawdown
-32.50%โœ“
-35.20%
Beta
0.75
1.18

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

6 - 14

๐Ÿ† QQQ wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
SPHD:0.30%โœ“
vs
QQQ:0.20%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
SPHD:51 holdingsโœ“
vs
QQQ:101 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
SPHD:+10.2%โœ“
vs
QQQ:+20.1%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
SPHD: 26.8% in top 10โœ“
QQQ: 49.6% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
SPHD: $4B
QQQ: $220B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
SPHD: 0.58
QQQ: 0.88โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
SPHD: 16.2%โœ“
QQQ: 22.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
SPHD: 93.1% uniqueโœ“
QQQ: 48.3% unique

Bottom line: QQQ wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider QQQ for your portfolio, but SPHD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

6 shared holdings representing 3.4% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockSPHD WeightQQQ WeightOverlap
1
PEP
PEP
1.86%1.06%1.06%
2
AMGN
AMGN
1.61%0.97%0.97%
3
CMCSA
CMCSA
1.19%0.59%0.59%
4
AEP
AEP
1.68%0.33%0.33%
5
EXC
EXC
1.60%0.24%0.24%
6
KHC
KHC
2.36%0.15%0.15%

Overlap by Sector

Consumer Staples
1 stocks ยท 1.06% overlap
Healthcare
1 stocks ยท 0.97% overlap
Communication Services
1 stocks ยท 0.59% overlap
Utilities
2 stocks ยท 0.57% overlap
Other
1 stocks ยท 0.15% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

6
Shared Stocks
3.4%
Total Overlap
5
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in SPHD

Unique to SPHD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
PFEPFE3.08%
MOMO3.02%
DOCDOC2.88%
UPSUPS2.69%
CAGCAG2.66%

Top Holdings Only in QQQ

Unique to QQQ

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA8.99%
AAPLAAPL7.94%
MSFTMSFT7.12%
AMZNAMZN4.87%
TSLATSLA4.21%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on SPHD or QQQ?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs