SCHZ vs BND: Complete Comparison

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
47.93%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
4 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

SCHZ
BND
47.9%
SCHZ Only
Overlap
BND Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

SCHZ Return
-0.17%
BND Return
-0.20%
Winner
SCHZ
+0.03%
Max Drawdown
SCHZ: -2.7%
BND: -2.7%
SCHZ Volatility (annualized)4.22%
BND Volatility (annualized)4.19%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
SCHZ
BND
1 Year Return
N/A
+2.8%
3 Year Return
N/A
-2.5%
5 Year Return
N/A
+0.5%
Volatility
undefined%
6.20%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

0 - 12

๐Ÿ† BND wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
SCHZ:0.50%โœ“
vs
BND:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
SCHZ:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
BND:11,520 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
SCHZ: 46.2% in top 10
BND: 24.2% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
SCHZ: $5B
BND: $105B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
SCHZ: 100.0% unique
BND: 100.0% unique

Bottom line: BND wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider BND for your portfolio, but SCHZ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

4 shared holdings representing 47.9% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockSCHZ WeightBND WeightOverlap
1
UST-10Y
U.S. Treasury Note 10Y
8.50%3.95%3.95%
2
UST-5Y
U.S. Treasury Note 5Y
7.20%3.35%3.35%
3
UST-2Y
U.S. Treasury Note 2Y
5.40%2.95%2.95%
4
UST-7Y
U.S. Treasury Note 7Y
2.80%2.15%2.15%

Overlap by Sector

Other
4 stocks ยท 12.40% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

4
Shared Stocks
47.9%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in SCHZ

Unique to SCHZ

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
UST-30YU.S. Treasury Bond 30Y5.80%
FNMA-MBSFNMA Mortgage-Backed4.85%
FHLMC-MBSFHLMC Mortgage-Backed3.92%
GNMA-MBSGNMA Mortgage-Backed3.15%
AAA-CORPAAA-Rated Corporate Bonds2.45%

Top Holdings Only in BND

Unique to BND

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
GNMA-30YGNMA 30Y MBS2.55%
FNMA-30YFNMA 30Y MBS2.35%
CORP-AAACorporate AAA Bonds1.95%
FHLMC-30YFreddie Mac 30Y MBS1.75%
UST-3YUS Treasury 3Y1.65%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on SCHZ or BND?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs