BND vs TLT Overlap

Comparing Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

BND
TLT
0.0%
BND Only
Overlap
TLT Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

BND Return
+2.60%
TLT Return
+3.47%
Winner
TLT
+0.87%
Max Drawdown
BND: -1.0%
TLT: -4.4%
BND Volatility (annualized)3.19%
TLT Volatility (annualized)8.96%

📈 Comparison

Metric
BND
TLT
1 Year Return
+2.8%
-2.5%
3 Year Return
-2.5%
-8.5%
5 Year Return
+0.5%
-1.8%
Volatility
6.20%
15.80%
Expense Ratio
0.03%
0.15%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
BND
TLT
Volatility
6.20%
15.80%
Sharpe Ratio
-0.12
-0.62
Sortino Ratio
-0.15
-0.85
Max Drawdown
-18.20%
-48.50%
Beta
0.02
-0.15

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

17 - 1

🏆 BND wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
BND:0.03%
vs
TLT:0.15%
🎯 Number of Holdings
BND:11,520 holdings
vs
TLT:29 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
BND:+0.5%
vs
TLT:-1.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
BND: 24.2% in top 10
TLT: 89.5% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
BND: $105B ✓
TLT: $45B
Sharpe Ratio
BND: -0.12
TLT: -0.62
📉 Volatility
BND: 6.2%
TLT: 15.8%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
BND: 100.0% unique
TLT: 100.0% unique

Bottom line: BND wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider BND for your portfolio, but TLT is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockBND WeightTLT WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in BND

Unique to BND

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
UST-10YUS Treasury 10Y3.95%
UST-5YUS Treasury 5Y3.35%
UST-2YUS Treasury 2Y2.95%
GNMA-30YGNMA 30Y MBS2.55%
FNMA-30YFNMA 30Y MBS2.35%

Top Holdings Only in TLT

Unique to TLT

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
UST-30YUS Treasury 30Y15.85%
UST-20YUS Treasury 20Y13.85%
UST-25YUS Treasury 25Y11.85%
UST-30Y-2US Treasury 30Y Bond 29.85%
UST-20Y-2US Treasury 20Y Bond 28.85%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs