XLE vs XOP: Complete Comparison

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund vs SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
31.83%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
15 of 22
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLE
XOP
31.8%
XLE Only
Overlap
XOP Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLE Return
+22.30%
XOP Return
+28.01%
Winner
XOP
+5.70%
Max Drawdown
XLE: -12.1%
XOP: -15.1%
XLE Volatility (annualized)23.48%
XOP Volatility (annualized)32.28%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
XLE
XOP
1 Year Return
+8.2%โœ“
+5.5%
3 Year Return
+18.5%
+22.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+12.8%
+12.8%
Volatility
28.50%โœ“
38.50%
Expense Ratio
0.10%โœ“
0.35%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
XLE
XOP
Volatility
28.50%โœ“
38.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.42โœ“
0.28
Sortino Ratio
0.58โœ“
0.35
Max Drawdown
-62.50%โœ“
-72.50%
Beta
1.35
1.52

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

7 - 7

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
XLE:0.10%โœ“
vs
XOP:0.35%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
XLE:21 holdingsโœ“
vs
XOP:55 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
XLE:+12.8%
vs
XOP:+12.8%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
XLE: 74.8% in top 10
XOP: 29.7% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
XLE: $32Bโœ“
XOP: $4B
โšก Sharpe Ratio
XLE: 0.42
XOP: 0.28
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
XLE: 28.5%โœ“
XOP: 38.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
XLE: 97.2% unique
XOP: 97.8% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: XLE and XOP are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

15 shared holdings representing 31.8% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLE WeightXOP WeightOverlap
1
VLO
VLO
3.74%2.89%2.89%
2
MPC
MPC
3.98%2.75%2.75%
3
PSX
PSX
3.88%2.69%2.69%
4
XOM
XOM
23.35%2.68%2.68%
5
EQT
EQT
2.51%2.92%2.51%
6
CVX
CVX
16.91%2.48%2.48%
7
COP
COP
6.90%2.42%2.42%
8
EOG
EOG
3.95%2.31%2.31%
9
OXY
OXY
2.05%2.36%2.05%
10
FANG
FANG
2.04%2.77%2.04%

Overlap by Sector

Energy
7 stocks ยท 18.22% overlap
Other
8 stocks ยท 13.38% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

15
Shared Stocks
31.8%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLE

Unique to XLE

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
WMBWMB4.55%
SLBSLB3.92%
KMIKMI3.66%
OKEOKE3.24%
BKRBKR3.23%

Top Holdings Only in XOP

Unique to XOP

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
CNXCNX3.37%
MURMUR3.15%
GPORGPOR3.00%
RRCRRC2.86%
ARAR2.73%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on XLE or XOP?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs